The discussion started with groups stating their thought on what was happening. It was very chaotic and unorganized during the discussion. The discussion then moved group stating what they wanted and their demands for compromise. Then the discussion became more organized and calm as compromises where discussed. I feel that the Native group present their ideas best. The promoters did a good job of making their position clear and being in character but the Native group shared a lot of evidence and reasoning to all of their decisions and views. It was interesting how all of the groups goals conflicted with each other so much, It was difficult to come to a compromise that was fair for all groups. I still wonder how these discussions went in real life and how they could try to compromise even with distance and language barriers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2018
Categories |